Born
in 1951, PHILLIP ALDER was a promising young British player until he emigrated
to the
It
is often written and said that bridge and chess
have close ties. It is true that many of us
first learned chess and later
gravitated towards bridge. But in the
playing of the two games there are
several obvious differences. In chess,
the positions of all the pieces are always known. In bridge, only some of the
cards are visible to each player. In chess, the number of possible moves
increases dramatically as the game unfolds, and just worrying about the sensible
ones and their ensuing variations is a formidable task. In bridge, the number of
possible bids and plays is more limited. However,
it is true in both games that if you do
not think of the best move, bid or
play, you will not make it.
Assume
this is the first round of spades; how many possible plays do you have?
Dummy
♠
A 2
♠
Q led
You
♠ K3
The
first two are easy: you could win in dummy
with the ace or in hand with the
king. But that is only half the
answer. You can also win in dummy with
the ace and unblock the king from
hand, or you can let your left-hand opponent win
the trick with the queen! It is true that these
last two plays tend to arise in double-dummy problems
rather than in real life at the table, but
if either were the winning play and
you did not consider it, how could you
get it right?
I
run some bridge classes and the biggest problem from which I see average players
suffering is their propensity for making the 'obvious' play; the first thing
that comes into their minds. I spend a
long time trying to make them consider
the alternatives.
Here
is a hand I set to a relatively
advanced group, from a lesson about fit-showing jumps by a passed hand.
North
Dealer |
ª |
3 2 | |||
|
Game
All |
© |
A
J 6 5 4 |
|
|
|
|
¨ |
Q
10 9 8 |
|
|
|
|
§ |
A
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
N |
|
|
ª |
ª | ||||
© |
|
|
W
E |
© |
|
¨ |
|
|
|
¨ |
|
§ |
|
|
|
§ |
|
|
|
|
S |
|
|
|
|
ª |
A
4 |
|
|
|
|
© |
K
3 2 |
|
|
|
|
¨ |
A
K J 7 6 5 4 3 |
|
|
|
|
§ |
----
|
|
|
W |
N |
E |
S |
|
Pass |
Pass |
1♦ |
Pass |
2♠ |
Pass |
4NT |
Pass |
5♥ |
Pass |
7♦ |
Pass |
Pass |
Pass |
|
The
bidding is a little rustic, but not totally unreasonable. North's jump to Two
Hearts is fit-showing,
indicating a maximum pass with hearts and diamonds. South's final shot is based
on the expectation that North will have most
of his goodies in his two suits.
Every
declarer won the opening king of spades lead in hand,
crossed to dummy with a diamond and discarded
their spade loser on the ace of clubs. Finally, they turned their attention to
the hearts and this was the full deal:
North Dealer |
ª |
3 2 | |||
|
Game
All |
© |
A
J 6 5 4 |
|
|
|
|
¨ |
Q
10 9 8 |
|
|
|
|
§ |
A
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
N |
|
|
ª | K Q J 10 | ª |
9
8 7 6 5 |
||
© |
7 |
|
W
E |
© |
Q
10 9 8 |
¨ |
2 |
|
|
¨ |
--- |
§ |
9
8 7 6 5 4 3 |
|
|
§ |
K
Q J 10 |
|
|
|
S |
|
|
|
|
ª |
A
4 |
|
|
|
|
© |
K
3 2 |
|
|
|
|
¨ |
A
K J 7 6 5 4 3 |
|
|
|
|
§ |
--- |
|
|
'Could
you avoid a heart loser, Phillip?' 'Yes.'
'How?'
'By
playing the suit differently.'
'But
East had queen-ten to four.'
'True, but I'd cash the king of
hearts, cross to the ace of hearts and ruff a
heart.'
'You'd
revoke.'
'Ha,
ha! No, I would not.'
Now
the penny drops at some tables. I explain that discarding a heart on the ace of
clubs and then establishing the hearts, using
dummy's trumps as entries, allows a late discard for that pesky spade loser.
THIS
theme crops up in the
bidding as well. A good player failed to find the winning action here
by not thinking about all the possibilities.
It
is a team game and only the opponents are vulnerable. Sitting West, you hold:
ª | 10 |
© |
10
6 2 |
¨ |
A
K 9 7 2 |
§ |
10 9 5 4 |
The bidding starts like this:
W |
N |
E |
S |
|
|
|
3♥ |
Pass |
Pass |
Dbl |
Pass |
? |
|
|
|
What
would be your choice?
Partner
will be assuming you have some six or seven points, so you are not worth a jump
to Five Diamonds. Realizing this, at time the player concerned bid a quiet Four
Diamonds. It worked out reasonably, but he did not consider the alternatives. If
he had, he would have thought about passing.
And if you do analyse that for a moment, you soon realize what a good idea it
is. You have two possible tricks of your own, and partner rates to have spade
strength opposite your singleton. Even if partner has made a light balancing
double, you will still probably defeat Three Hearts and you are unlikely
to be making a game.
This
was the full deal:
South Dealer | ª | 7 5 4 2 | |||
|
N-S
Game |
© |
3 |
|
|
|
|
¨ |
Q
8 4 3 |
|
|
|
|
§ |
J
7 6 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
N |
|
|
ª | 10 | ª |
A
Q J 9 8 |
||
© |
10
6 2 |
|
W
E |
© |
A
5 |
¨ |
A
K 9 7 2 |
|
|
¨ |
J
6 5 |
§ |
10
9 5 3 |
|
|
§ |
A
K Q |
|
|
|
S |
|
|
|
|
ª |
K
6 3 |
|
|
|
|
© |
K
Q J 9 8 7 4 |
|
|
|
|
¨ |
10 |
|
|
|
|
§ |
8
2 |
|
|
Three
Hearts doubled costs a cool 1100. West leads
a top diamond and switches to the ten of spades.
East wins with the ace and returns the
eight, West ruffing declarer's king.
East regains the
lead in clubs and cashes his two black-suit
tricks before continuing spades. Declarer can
ruff the fourth round high and lead a top trump, but East wins with the ace and
plays another spade, promoting the ten of hearts as
the eighth defensive trick.
At
the time, the auction went as follows:
W |
N |
E |
S |
|
|
|
3♥ |
Pass |
Pass |
Dbl |
Pass |
4♦ |
Pass |
4♠ |
Pass |
5♣ |
Pass |
5♦ |
Pass |
|
Pass |
|
|
|
|
|
|
On
the second round, West hoped his partner did
not have a strong one-suiter in spades and
continued the hunt for a minor-suit fit.
Against Five Diamonds, North led the three of hearts, an obvious singleton. Declarer put up dummy's ace of hearts and considered his
alternatives
in the trump suit. To cross to the ace and lead low back towards the jack
risked losing to a doubleton queen in the South
hand. So West decided to cash both
top honours and, if North proved to have two
trump tricks, to take the ruffing spade finesse in an effort to get
rid of the heart losers.
South's
having the singleton ten of diamonds was good news, and allowed West to drive
out the queen. Declarer won North's club exit in the dummy and took the
ruffing spade finesse to guarantee his contract. When it won he ended with an
overtrick, but +420 was a scant return compared with the 1100 that
was there for the taking if West had taken
care to consider the alternatives in the auction.
FINALLY,
a defensive hand:
West
Dealer |
ª | A K J 10 | |||
|
N-S
Game |
© |
Q
J |
|
|
|
|
¨ |
A
K Q 8 |
|
|
|
|
§ |
6
4 2 |
|
|
|
|
|
N |
|
|
ª | ª |
7
6 2 |
|||
© |
|
|
W
E |
© |
5 |
¨ |
|
|
|
¨ |
J
9 7 4 3 |
§ |
|
|
|
§ |
10
8 7 3 |
|
|
|
S |
|
|
|
|
ª |
|
|
|
|
|
© |
|
|
|
|
|
¨ |
|
|
|
|
|
§ |
|
|
|
W |
N |
E |
S |
1♥ |
Dbl |
Pass |
1♠ |
2♥ |
2♠ |
Pass |
3♥ |
Pass |
4♠ |
All |
Pass |
You
might not like North's bidding, but that is what he did at the time.
West leads the king of hearts and continues with the ace. Which card should East play?
This
sort of problem is much easier on paper. At the table, most players
would calmly discard a diamond (or a club)
without really giving the matter much thought. However, if you have trained
yourself to consider the alternatives, you will pause. You need four tricks to
defeat Four Spades: where will they come from?
There
are two heart tricks in the bag, but nothing in sight in diamonds and
spades. That leaves clubs, and there is a
need to expedite matters as declarer might be able to get a discard or two on
dummy's diamonds.
If you give the matter some thought, you will realize that the correct defence is to ruff partner's ace of hearts and return a club. This was the full deal:
West
Dealer |
ª | A K J 10 | |||
|
N-S
Game |
© |
Q
J |
|
|
|
|
¨ |
A
K Q 8 |
|
|
|
|
§ |
6
4 2 |
|
|
|
|
|
N |
|
|
ª | ª | 7 6 2 | |||
© |
A
K 10 9 4 3 |
|
W
E |
© |
5 |
¨ |
10
8 6 |
|
|
¨ |
J
9 7 4 3 |
§ |
A
Q 9 |
|
|
§ |
10
8 7 3 |
|
|
|
S |
|
|
|
|
ª |
Q
9 8 5 3 |
|
|
|
|
© |
8
7 6 2 |
|
|
|
|
¨ |
2 |
|
|
|
|
§ |
K
J 5 |
|
|
This
play was found at the table by the late, great Helen Sobel.
without thinking:
consider the alternatives.