Hand of the week commencing
Sunday 4th May 2008
|
|
North
Dealer |
ª |
K
Q 10 7
|
|
|
|
|
Neither
Vulnerable |
© |
A
7 6 |
|
|
|
|
|
¨ |
A
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
§ |
K
7 5 2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
N |
|
|
|
ª |
J
9 5 4 3 2
|
|
|
ª |
6 |
|
© |
|
|
W
E |
© |
10
9 8 3 2 |
|
¨ |
7
6 4 |
|
|
¨ |
10
9 5 3 |
|
§ |
A
10 4 3 |
|
|
§ |
Q
9 8 |
|
|
|
|
S |
|
|
|
|
|
ª |
A
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
© |
K
Q J 5 4 |
|
|
|
|
|
¨ |
K
Q J 2 |
|
|
|
|
|
§ |
J
6 |
|
|
|
W |
N |
E |
S |
|
|
1§ |
NO |
1© |
|
NO |
1ª |
NO |
2¨ |
|
NO |
3© |
NO |
4NT |
|
NO |
5© |
NO |
6NT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As West, what lead
would you make against South’s 6NT contract ?
In the Teams Event in the 2004
In the other room their opponents were playing in the normal 6©
contract which was doomed with the unfortunate 5:0 division. Perhaps justice was
seen to be done when Richard found the Club lead.