MICHEL
LEBEL was born in 1944 in Romania but now lives in Nantes, France. A WBF Grand
Master, he has won the World Teams
Olympiad twice, the European Teams twice and the European Pairs once. He is
bridge columnist of Le
Point and
the author or co-author of many books.
Successful
defence often requires that you should
take all possible measures to shut out dummy's
long suit. You must do all you can to spoil declarer's communications.
Sitting
over dummy's KQ109x, you will, as a matter of course, hold off with AJx when
dummy's king is played. But when the ten is finessed?
The position is essentially the same; to
kill the suit it may be necessary to hold off, persuading declarer to
finesse the nine next time. If you win the ten with the jack he will have better
communications, obviously.
My
tip is that you should sometimes hold up the
jack even when you do not possess the ace.
You will find that quite remarkable results can be obtained. On the
following deal I held the East cards:
South
Dealer |
ª |
A 6 4 | |||
|
Game
All |
© |
8
2 |
|
|
|
|
¨ |
K
Q 10 9 6 3 |
|
|
|
|
§ |
8
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
N |
|
|
ª |
J 9 3 |
ª |
10 8 5 2 | ||
© |
Q
9 4 3 |
|
W
E |
© |
J
7 5 |
¨ |
A
5 4 |
|
|
¨ |
J
8 |
§ |
K
J 2 |
|
|
§ |
Q
7 6 5 |
|
|
|
S |
|
|
|
|
ª |
K
Q 7 |
|
|
|
|
© |
A
K 10 6 |
|
|
|
|
¨ |
7
2 |
|
|
§ | A 10 9 4 |
South
opened 1NT, North raised to 3NT, and West
led the three of hearts, East's jack losing to declarer's king. South
played a low diamond to dummy's nine and East, without any hesitation, allowed
the nine to win!
South
quite naturally came back to his hand with a spade and repeated the finesse.
When the ten lost to the jack he could no
longer make nine tricks as he was
short of entries to bring in the diamonds.
In
the next example, after the same bidding, West led the jack of spades
against South's 3NT:
South
Dealer |
ª | 8 6 2 | |||
|
N-S
Game |
© |
10
4 |
|
|
|
|
¨ |
A
Q 10 9 6 3 |
|
|
|
|
§ |
7
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
N |
|
|
ª | J 10 9 | ª | Q 5 4 3 | ||
© |
K
8 7 |
|
W
E |
© |
J
9 3 2 |
¨ |
K
4 2 |
|
|
¨ |
J
7 |
§ |
K
J 8 5 |
|
|
§ |
Q
6 2 |
|
|
|
S |
|
|
|
|
ª |
A
J 7 |
|
|
|
|
© |
A
Q 6 5 |
|
|
|
|
¨ |
8
5 |
|
|
|
|
§ |
A
10 9 3 |
|
|
South
won the first trick with the king of spades
and ran the eight of diamonds ... which held
the trick! South continued with the five of diamonds and paused when West
produced a low diamond. Either West held KJxx, thought South, in which case the contract was bound to fail, or East had
tried a desperate measure, holding up the king from Kx.
South
decided to go up with the ace, believing this
was the only chance to make the contract
... and he nearly fell off his chair when the jack appeared. Once again,
it is clear that holding up the jack is the only way to lead declarer astray.
EXTENDING the same principle, observe how the hold-up makes declarer's task more difficult on this deal:
West
Dealer |
ª | A 6 2 | |||
|
Love
All |
© |
8
4 |
|
|
|
|
¨ |
K
10 9 8 5 2 |
|
|
|
|
§ |
9
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
N |
|
|
ª | J 10 9 4 3 | ª | 7 5 | ||
© |
Q
10 3 |
|
W
E |
© |
J
9 6 5 2 |
¨ |
A
Q 7 |
|
|
¨ |
J
3 |
§ |
Q
8 |
|
|
§ |
A
10 4 3 |
|
|
|
S |
|
|
|
|
ª |
K
Q 8 |
|
|
|
|
© |
A
K 7 |
|
|
|
|
¨ |
6
4 |
|
|
|
|
§ |
K
J 6 5 2 |
|
|
West
leads the jack of spades against 3NT and South wins with the king. He leads the
four of diamonds to the second trick, West plays the seven and dummy the eight.
If
East wins with the jack, the contract will surely be made, as South will easily
establish the diamonds, with the ace of
spades for entry. But if East ducks the first diamond, South will come
back to his hand with a heart and lead his second diamond. When West
produces the queen, the declarer may
conclude that East has held up the ace and that the suit is distributed
in this fashion:
Dummy
|
¨ |
West |
East |
¨ |
¨ |
Declarer
¨
If South forms this opinion he will duck on the second round. It is true that East's hold-up, with Ax, would be a mistake, but it is not so unlikely a mistake.
My BOLS bridge tip is this:
Whenever dummy has a suit such as AQ109x or KQ109x, and appears to be short of entries, be willing to hold off with Jx.
You may well find that this daring manoeuvre offers the only real chance of preventing declarer from bringing in the long suit.